A computer would be unusable after a while if you couldn't reboot it. The memory gets clogged, processes start interfering with each other, rogue subroutines start hijacking all of the CPU. Everything grinds to a halt as inescapable infinite loops are generated. A blue screen crash is on its way.
The same breakdown process is true of almost anything. Death is a human blue screen crash. And reincarnation can be described as the ultimate reboot button - you get a whole new life and can start again.
The ways in which humanity can be rebooted are actually extraordinarily simple in principle yet extraordinarily difficult to implement. There are only three issues that need to be addressed:
1) Wealth
If the rich keep getting richer, they become ever more powerful and influential, eventually establishing an untouchable privileged elite taking active steps to maintain its position. Above all, the members of the elite ensure that their wealth can never be rebooted because that would automatically mean the end of their power.
A government that implemented a 100% inheritance tax i.e. that prevented a single penny from being passed on by any rich people to their heirs would, in that one law, have rebooted the wealth of the world, and ensured that it kept being rebooted generation after generation. With this law in place, it would be impossible for dynastic families of extreme wealth and power - such as the Rothschilds - to exist. Their power would be instantly dissolved. The current Rothschilds would be last to the trouble the world with their super greed.
The vast majority of people in the world have no significant assets to pass on. A tiny number of families have an enormous amount of assets to transmit from one generation to the next. Why should the overwhelming majority be agreeable to this? If you want to help your children and your children's children, the best thing you can do for them is to make sure that they are not the losers in a rigged system where the privileged are the guaranteed winners.
Who in their right mind wouldn't support the "Wealth Reboot Tax"? This tax, by itself, would destroy the Old World Order. It's that simple. Freedom from the elite is just one tax away. Of course, they know that better than anyone. They have had to wage the greatest psychological war in history to prevent the people imposing such a tax on them. Billions of poor and badly educated people have been mind controlled into thinking that there's nothing wrong with the rich getting richer. That it's good, it's healthy, it's morally right, that disaster would befall us if we taxed the super rich out of existence. The "American Dream" encourages the suckers and losers to delude themselves that they too might be super rich one day, though the odds against it are simply astronomical. Well, time to get real. If you want fairness, justice, an end to privilege and to the ruling elite, there's only one way to do it: reboot each person's wealth when they die. Rather than being passed on to private individuals, a dead person's assets should automatically be transferred to the Commonwealth - which is the wealth of all rather than the wealth of the chosen few.
What do the Old World Order most fear? - removal of their money and their dynastic privileges. That's what 100% inheritance tax accomplishes, hence is the silver bullet, the holy water, the stake through the heart to destroy these undead, blood-sucking vampires. 100% inheritance tax is the legal and economic enforcement of equal opportunities.
2) Children
Children are deliberately brainwashed by both their parents and their governments. Brainwashing is the mechanism that allows the virus of the old religions to be transmitted from one generation to the next and that allows the values of the elite to be permanently embedded in society.
You can reboot the world by ensuring that no such brainwashing is ever allowed to take place. All children should be protected by law from any attempt to brainwash them. Children should be taught as many different religions as possible, as well as atheism, agnosticism and skepticism, and all of these should be taught critically rather than "respectfully" i.e. their faults, flaws and illogicalities should be ruthlessly exposed and even ridiculed. Truth and reason should not defer to crazy beliefs just because they're old and entrenched in society.
Children should be taught about different political and economic systems, again critically, with none being promoted as the "right and proper" systems as has been traditionally done with capitalism and democracy. It's up to everyone to make up their own mind based on the evidence, rational argument and the quality and rigour of theory. Who could possibly object to that? - apart from fanatics frothing at the mouth. And aren't they exactly the people we should be protecting impressionable minds from?
Anyone who thinks they have a convincing argument should have no fear in letting it take its chances amongst all of the other competing ideas. The type of people who want to genitally mutilate babies to ensure that they get their "brand" on them as early as possible have no place in any civilised society. Circumcision should be illegal in modern nations. It's a barbaric, superstitious practice that stands as a fundamental attack on human rights.
The sort of people who want to psychologically terrify children with stories of eternal hellfire can't be allowed to spread their poison unchallenged. The sort of people who proclaim that "greed is good" and "profit is God" can't be given a free run.
The No-Brainwashing (Mental Reboot) Law is all that's needed to reboot the collective Mind of humanity. Children will be released from the poisonous ideas of the past. Who can doubt that Abrahamism and capitalism will perish in one generation if children are given a free choice? If humanity isn't irredeemably irrational then it will take the rational decision that sets it on a whole new path. Isn't it time the human race put its mistakes and its childish past behind it? Isn't it time it consigned superstition and prejudice to oblivion? We are free. We are not obliged to believe what our parents believe. Should we believe in a flat earth or that the sun orbits the earth just because these were once popular beliefs?
3) The Dialectic
The dialectical process involves a thesis and an opposing antithesis, followed by a harmonising synthesis, which then becomes a new higher thesis which is opposed by a more sophisticated antithesis, which gives rises to a higher synthesis and so on in a continual, progressive rebooting mechanism, allowing a superior starting boot each time round the dialectical loop.
In Freud's tripartite model of the human psyche involving the id, the ego and the superego, we see the rudiments of a dialectical system. The id, obsessed with its own pleasure and selfish drives, demands instant gratification of any of its desires, no matter how socially unacceptable. If we call this the thesis then it is opposed by the antithesis of the superego, which is concerned with morality, community, altruism, conscience, the rules of society, parental prohibitions etc. The ego, the pragmatic, rational agent that obeys the reality principle, provides a synthesis of the conflicting demands of the id and superego.
In childhood and early adulthood, the ego may not be too good at its job, but as life experience and knowledge grows, it gets dialectically better and better. Unfortunately, in the West, we live in an irrational society devoted to instant gratification, so the ego is much more attuned to the id rather than offering a proper balance between id and superego. If we could build into society healthy, functioning dialectical institutions, we could transform the world.
Every religion, company, bank, institution, school, university etc should be explicitly modelled on the dialectical human psyche i.e. there should be a highly energetic, passionate and selfish id component counterbalanced by an equally energetic and passionate component advocating altruism, morality, social responsibility, regulation, avoidance of unnecessary risk etc. Finally, there should be a rational, synthesis component which takes cognisance of the counterclaims of the thesis and antithesis and carries out the most rational strategy in the prevailing circumstances.
If we look at the recent financial crisis, there was a complete failure of the regulatory superego component. The id component (the hyper greedy and selfish banking system) was allowed to go berserk with self-indulgence, instant gratification and utter contempt for society as a whole. There was no ego component to rein back the id and to apply reason and pragmatism. The disastrous outcome was therefore both predictable and inevitable and any fool on earth should have seen it coming.
We live in the most infantile, stupid type of society, entirely geared to the unrestrained impulses of the id leading to endless cycles of boom (hyper-greed) and bust (hyper-fear). It needn't be like this. We need a Dialectical Reboot Law that makes it compulsory for all aspects of society to be fully regulated by a superego component to curb id excesses, and with a rational ego component to reach a compromise between a particular institution and its regulator.
The West has just a few feeble, ineffectual, impotent regulators that are there for little more than appearances' sake. The financial crisis fully exposed their incompetence. Regulators - Devil's Advocates, so to speak - must be embedded in society and given real, meaningful powers, and be full of talented, strong-minded people.
Above all, we need an entirely new component of society representing the synthesis phase of the dialectic. This function - Arbitration - decides what is permissible in any dispute between an institution and its regulator. In this way, the dialectic would become ingrained in everything we do, with the promise that it will lead us to higher and higher states of prosperity, progress and fulfilment.
The American political system was designed on the basis of the "separation of powers" and "checks and balances". Unfortunately, it didn't go nearly far enough. The whole of society, not just politics, needs to be handled this way.
The Americans failed to realise that if there was an extremely powerful body outside the political process that could directly influence the political process then the political separation of powers and the checks and balances were rendered irrelevant. The external body we are referring to is the banking system and corporate lobbying. These were able to use their financial muscle to buy the political process and make it do its bidding.
The great Illuminatus Thomas Jefferson was one person acutely aware of the danger. He said, "I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered." Was he wrong? Tragically, his wisdom was ignored.
All American politicians are in the pockets of bankers and corporations. Their political job is to promote Zionist, Masonic, corporate and banking interests - and to hell with the people, that bunch of suckers who have allowed their political system to be hijacked and prostituted. The harsh reality is that America's elected representatives, the ones accountable to the people, are not running American politics. Rather, it is run by private men behind the curtain, unelected and unaccountable, and excessively rich, powerful and ruthless.
If you want a healthy political system you cannot under any circumstances have a private power above politics, but that's exactly what you get if you allow the banks that control the economy to be run by private individuals. It would be insane to replace the American military with a private army commanded by private generals who could declare war on nations on their own account, regardless of the wishes of the people. So why is the banking system, the lifeblood of the economy, in private hands, able to do whatever it likes regardless of the wishes and interests of the people? The financial crisis was caused by bankers who had no investment at all in social responsibility and who wallowed in moral hazard - taking absurd risks with other people's money for which they would suffer no penalty if anything went wrong but gain massive profits for themselves if things went right. It's mad to allow banks to be in private hands. When it comes to privately controlled banking, cui bono? - the Old World Order, the Zionists and Masons, of course. Their great insight was that democracy - the so-called power of the people - didn't amount to a hill of beans so long as they controlled the money, hence could buy and manipulate the politicians. Therefore, they became enthusiastic cheerleaders for democracy.
A private banking system is intrinsically anti-democratic and contrary to the interests of the people and to a healthy economy run for the benefit of the people.
So, there you have it - the three laws that can reboot the world:
1) The Wealth Reboot Law
2) The No-Brainwashing (Mental Reboot) Law
3) The Dialectical Reboot Law
These are the laws of reason and only the irrational will oppose them, or those who have a vested interest in the world staying exactly as it is - fucked for everyone other than them.
This is the formula for destroying the Old World Order and building a New World Order in which the people are free at last. We are just three laws from liberty. Isn't it time we implemented these laws? Isn't it time for the rebirth of the world? This time we'll put right everything that went wrong first time round.
Earth I was the Demiurge's dark and dismal creation. Earth II will be humanity's own creation, and will crystallise the victory of reason over irrationality, knowledge over faith and superstition, light over darkness, good over evil.
No comments:
Post a Comment