| ||
The Hand of Hope |
During the surgery on little Samuel, the little guy reached his tiny but fully developed hand through the incision and firmly grasped the surgeon's finger.
|
| The picture is that of a 21-week-old unborn baby named Samuel Alexander Armas, who is being operated on by a surgeon named Joseph Bruner. The baby was diagnosed with spina bifida and would not survive if removed from his mother's womb. Little Samuel's mother, Julie Armas, is an obstetrics nurse in Atlanta. She knew of Dr. Bruner's remarkable surgical procedure. Practicing at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville, he performs these special operations while the baby is still in the womb. Michael Clancy, working for USA Today capturedthe surgery on film. During the procedure, the doctor removes the uterus via C-section and makes a small incision to operate on the baby. During the surgery on little Samuel, the little guy reached his tiny but fully developed, hand through the incision and firmly grasped the surgeon's finger. The photograph captures this amazing event with perfect clarity. The editors titled the picture, "Hand of Hope." The text explaining the picture begins, "The tiny hand of 21-week-old fetus Samuel Alexander Armas emerges from the mother's uterus to grasp the finger of Dr. Joseph Bruner as if thanking the doctor for the gift of life."Little Samuel's mother said they "wept for days" when they saw the picture. She said, "The photo reminds us my pregnancy isn't about disability or an illness, it's about a little person" "The Hand" of the fetus. You can see the actual picture, and it is awesome...incredible. |
God made only mankind in his image. We are uniquely singled out bearing the image of God above any other creature. He is the sole object of Christ's redemptive love. Christ went to the trouble of dying for our transgressions against God by becoming a human first. He went through the process of being put in a womb and being there for 9 months like any other, then born under the human conditions (without sin). Certainly The preexistent Son of God was a person, and he was a person in the womb.God said to Noah "Whoever sheds man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed; for God made man in his own image." (Gen. 9:6) God points out that man is unique he is worth more than animals. | ||||
| ||||
| On September 11th, 2001, Islamic terrorists killed 3000 innocent people who were peaceably trying to live their lives. On that same day, 3500sweet babies just like little Samuel died from abortion in America. This, all at a time when there are lines of people, all waiting to adopt these holy innocents. Every day, over 3500 babies are murdered by abortion in the United States. That's over 1.2 million abortions every year.
REMEMBER THE WARNING FROM JESUS...
| ||||
The American Holocaust
| ||||
| Abortion Doctors have murdered over 52 million real American people (babies) since 1973 A great many of these infants had their fully developed skulls crushed by so-called "doctors" | ||||
Who in the 1950's or 1960's could have dreamed that the America we love would have made it an undeniable right (Law) that a woman could contract a so-called "doctor" to reach into her uterus with forceps and crush the head of a well-formed thinking and feeling baby, pull apart the baby's limbs with cold steel instruments and burn its small body with saline solution? |
|
![[image]](http://prorege-forum.com/abortion-12yrold.gif)
| This is not a broken doll. This little boy was one of several third trimester BABIES found in medical waste bags outside a legal abortion center in Houston, Texas, in late 1986. He was 14 inches long, weighed 2 pounds 2 ounces, and was 30 weeks gestation....... 7 MONTHS OLD......when he was killed. | This is a precious 4 1/2 month old little girl, burned by saline solution a "doctor" used to abort her. There are 4000 babies aborted each day in America (one every 20 seconds). Abortion is legal through all nine months of pregnancy. | This black BABY was aborted on May 11, 1987, at the Michigan Avenue Medical Center in Chicago, Illinois, by the "D&E" (dilation & evacuation) method. By this "procedure" the abortionist uses large forceps to crush the baby inside the mother's uterus and remove it in pieces. |
The mothers of these babies above elected to torture and kill their own babies.
| ||
Premature babies do feel pain! Don't listen to Planned Parenthood on this...
| ||
Premature babies 'feel true pain'
|
News Flash
|
 Click above picture to see more(Bible Probe makes not 1 cent from this or any referral) | ||||||
| ||||||
Abortion Linked to Premature Births | ||||||
| 7 June 2005: Such findings are based on data collected and analyzed by Dr. Caroline Moreau of Hospital de Bicetre and her colleagues. As reported by LifeSite.net, the researchers concluded "that women with a history of abortion were 1.5 times more likely to give birth very prematurely (under 33 weeks gestation), and 1.7 times more likely to have a baby born extremely (under 28 weeks gestation) preterm."Also, statistics show that teenage girls who have abortions are twice as likely to commit suicide and are much more likely to suffer other mental-health problems. | ||||||
| ||||||
Without abortion, America's African-American population of 42 million people would be about 35% larger today.
Who is responsible for this? The same political party who always courts African-American votes, which blacks have always voted for. The Democratic party is without a doubt the force behind this murder of America's babies, and especially African-American babies. Yet blacks seem blind to this. John Kerry, Ted Kennedy and nearly all Democrats admit they are for abortion. Who can doubt the Democrat resolve to sustain and advance abortion after watching any Supreme Court nomination proceeding? Then, why do African-American continue to vote Democrat, which means their demise?
John Kerry argues that an unborn child is not a person, so this unborn baby is therefore not protected by the law. Blacks should remember that the Supreme Court used this same basic flawed argument in 1857 during their "Dred Scott" decision. The outcome, was that this court declared that blacks simply weren't persons because they were inferior; so the law didn't protect them.
| ||||||
| ||||||
Using 1990-2003 data, a Pfizer/National Medical Association study has found. that the breast-cancer death rate for black women was 14 percent higher than for white women in 1990, yet 36 percent higher in 2002. See this real story about a woman dying of Breast Cancer: HERE | ||||||
|
ABORTION - and LINK to Breast Cancer
She wasn't the first to notice this correlation. Angela also noticed that studies showing this correlation were not getting into clinicians' literature. She says it made her mad. She couldn't stand seeing those 30-year olds in the office, with breast cancer with little toddlers. "These children weren't going to have their mothers" she said. Angela said that in 1996 she read a meta-analysis of the relevant studies by a Joel Brind, Ph.D. who was a biology professor at Baruch College in New York, who helped put the pieces together. According to Joel's article the first study that showed a link between breast cancer and abortion was published in 1957 in the prominent English-language Japanese Journal of Cancer Research. In those days, abortion was legal in Japan. At the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Institute in Seattle, cancer researcher Janet Daling and a team of scholars found "[a]mong women who had been pregnant at least once, the breast cancer rate in those who had experienced an induced abortion was 50 percent higher than among other women. Highest risks were observed when the abortion was done at ages younger than 18 years...or at least 30 years of age or older." | ||||||
| ||||||
| ||||||
| Genetic Technology: Evidence of Murder By Kelly Hollowell, J.D., Ph.D. Science Ministries - On the dawn of a new era in genetic technology, most people are focusing on the potential benefits of drugs tailor-made for individuals, gene therapy, and predictive testing. Others fear the possible abuses of science and technology, and the creation of a "brave new world." So, as scientists, politicians, and ethicists argue about the technology, where should our focus as Christians lie? First, Christians have the opportunity and obligation to take the lead on the social and legal policies that keep pace with technology. Currently, there are few such policies in place. Getting involved on the ground floor will be key to future decisions that will affect our worldview. Second, if we put our minds to it, understanding the technology might be used to our advantage to undo some current policies not in agreement with Biblical principles. Here is the prime example: Thanks to our understanding of the human genome and cloning technology, Christians can now state with scientific conviction that life begins at conception. Even the secular community agrees. The first page of the New York Times article about the new "gene map" is quoted as saying that, "the human genome is a pearl, a model of high performance and reliability. Millions of times a year, egg genome meets sperm genome and the result is a human baby, its parts all in place, its brains a universe of love and meaning."(1) Combine this understanding with what we know from cloning experiments. Scientific studies have shown that a cloned life cannot become anything but a genetic duplicate of the original, even at its earliest stages. It is set on a predetermined pathway of life from the moment of conception. It cannot have a different eye color. It cannot have a different hair color. It is a carbon copy in every physiological respect. We have only to read between the genetic lines to understand that this means life begins at conception. Now apply this understanding to current abortion policy. In 1973, Justice Harry Blackmun is quoted from Roe v. Wade as saying, "We need not resolve the difficult question of when life begins. When those trained in the respective disciplines of medicine, philosophy, and theology are unable to arrive at any consensus, the judiciary, at this point in the development of man's knowledge, is not in a position to speculate."(2) Clearly, today, that is no longer the case. We can now say with scientific certainty when life begins. It only requires getting this information into the hands of committed Christians who will tolerate the abomination of abortion no longer. Proponents of abortion must be made to listen to themselves. At a minimum, they must be forced to acknowledge that if they persist in their policies regarding abortion, then they must own up to murder. No more sugarcoated terms like "viability" and "preembryo" should be permitted. If a child's life has no value as compared to the mother, at least force proponents of abortion to say so. Let's force them to have the intellectual integrity to stand behind their "choice" to kill the child. Let's no longer allow them to hide behind the veil of ignorance and technical terminology. If they must kill, let them be branded as murderers and nothing less. Forcing their hand on this issue will not be easy. It is no small irony that, on the dawn of this new era, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of partial birth abortion. Our work is cut out for us, but God and science are on our side. Let's embrace this cutting edge technology and use it, for once, the way our opponents always do, to our advantage. | ||||||
Early Church Fathers were Unanimously against Abortion
| ||||||
Call or Visit
Care Net | ||||||
 | ||||||
| Care Net's strategy is simple. They hope and pray women are led to their local pro-life pregnancy center before they are deceived into choosing death at an abortion clinic. Care Net also seeks to exalt Jesus Christ and to bring new hope to those who have been led astray. Many women who visit Care Net pregnancy Centers are trapped in destructive lifestyles. Many find themselves pressured by partners, parents and peers to end their pregnancies. And many more have simply fallen for the lie that abortion is their only feasible pregnancy option.The ministry of Care Net is about presenting the Gospel of Jesus and presenting the Gospel of Life. Read the story of Lori.... A young mother who chose life after visiting Care Net's site for women. Single and pregnant, Lori thought that ending her pregnancy was the only way out. She made an appointment for an abortion. But still having questions, Lori logged onto her computer and typed in the word "abortion". That is how Lori found the Care Net website. When Lori called the Care Net Option line 1-800 number, she reached one of their caring consultants and was encouraged to consider positive pregnancy options. Then Lori was connected to her local Care Net pregnancy center. After visiting her local Care Net center and receiving counseling from Christians, Lori chose life for her baby. Lori said; "I am so thankful for my beautiful brown-eyed Emily, and am grateful that I found the website".... | ||||||
Visit the Care Net website HERE
|
May 2008 News
| ||
Please read More at Let Us Reason Ministries
|
Birth of an Angel
|
AngelsOnce upon a time there was a child ready to be born. So one day, she asked God: They tell me you are sending me to earth tomorrow, but how am I going to live there being so small and helpless? Among the many angels, I chose one for you. She'll be waiting for you and will take care of you. But, tell me, here in Heaven, I don't do anything else but sing and smile - that's enough for me to be happy. Your angel will sing for you and will also smile for you everyday. And you will feel your angel's love and be happy. And how am I going to be able to understand when people talk to me, if I don't know the language men talk? Your angel will tell you the most beautiful and sweet words you will ever hear, and with much patience and care, your angel will teach you how to speak. And what am I going to do when I want to talk to you? Your angel will place your hands together and teach you how to pray. I've heard that on earth there are bad men. Who will protect me? Your angel will defend you - even if it means risking her life. But I will always be sad because I will not see you anymore. Your angel will always talk to you about me and will teach you the way for you to come back to me - even though I will always be next to you. At that moment, there was much peace in heaven. But voices from earth could already be heard and the child, in a hurry, asked softly: Oh, God, if I'm about to leave now, please tell me my angel's name. Your angel's name is of no importance. You will just call your angel, "Mommy". |
 |
 |
RU-486 is an abortion cocktail that takes up to 44 days to end unwanted pregnancies and is a back-alley solution in developing countries. |
Strong and reliable evidence exists that this two-drug abortion regimen is far from safe for women! |
In 2005, the FDA admitted to receiving more than 600 reports of serious complications from the use of RU-486. These complications include bacterial infections, bleeding, ruptured ectopic pregnancies, and death. In July 2005, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) revealed that five American women had died after using RU-486. |
NEWS - 17 March 2006WASHINGTON (AP) -- Two more women have died after using the so-called "abortion pill" RU-486, regulators said Friday in a warning that brought renewed calls for pulling the drug combination from the market. The Food and Drug Administration warned doctors to watch for a rare but deadly infection previously implicated in four deaths of women who had taken RU-486. The drug combination, also called Mifeprex or mifepristone, has not been proved to be the cause in any of those cases. |
See the lies Pro-Abortions told to get acceptance of abortion..
by David Kupelian See at Amazon here |
Struggling for Lifeby Dr. Kelly Hollowell
|
How your Tax Dollars and Twisted Science Target the Unborn
|
| The most dangerous time in any child's life is his or her first nine months. That's because abortion takes one out of every four children conceived in America, making the route from womb to tomb very short for millions of unborn boys and girls. "Struggling for Life" provides a shocking glimpse into how your tax dollars and twisted biomedical research are targeting the unborn. Written by Dr. Kelly Hollowell, WND contributor and founder of Science Ministries, Inc., this riveting, sometimes personal account details the gushing flow of federal dollars into the coffers of America's leading abortion performer. |
$9.00 at WorldNetDaily.com here
|
 |
| The Party of Death: The Democrats, the Media, the Courts, and the Disregard for Human Life |
by Ramesh Ponnuru They celebrate abortion on demand as a fundamental human right. They advocate euthanasia, and work energetically for embryo-killing research. They explicitly deny that all human beings are equal in having a right to life, and unblushingly propose the creation of a category of "human non-persons" who can be treated as expendable. In line with that, some of them have already begun calling for the killing of sick infants -- for their own good, of course. They are the party of death, and they are becoming increasingly powerful in America today, as well as in the world at large. Now, in The Party of Death: The Democrats, the Media, the Courts, and the Disregard for Human Life, National Review's Ramesh Ponnuru provides an unflinching exposé of their past successes, present activities, and future plans, showing why their principles are so harmful - and how they can be defeated before they destroy our society altogether. Members of the party of death, Ponnuru notes here, are everywhere. They have taken over the Democratic party lock, stock, and barrel -- although they can be found in both parties. He details how the pernicious influence of this dedicated band has permeated every aspect of our culture, corrupting law, politics, and even the teaching of history. Legal abortion, Ponnuru reveals, has unlocked the floodgates for numerous issues that have advanced the death culture, leading directly to the current national debates on euthanasia and embryo-killing for research purposes. All this has happened, Ponnuru explains, with active help from the media establishment: with collusion from leading media figures, leading Democrats such as Hillary and Bill Clinton, Barbara Boxer, and Mario Cuomo have cannily camouflaged the party of death's extreme and outlandish views. But they haven't yet won a total victory. Ponnuru argues that the same process by which the party of death has made such deep inroads into American society can now be used in reverse: pro-lifers must strive harder than ever to restrict abortion and ultimately to end it altogether, for the more we reject abortion, the more we may come to reject other choices for death, too. In an America that is turning away from abortion on demand, the Democrats may prove to be the last victims of the party of death. In The Party of Death, Ramesh Ponnuru provides a solid and encouraging program to relegate this poisonous party to the dustbin of history. |
| Britain (Ephraim) in Prophesy - because of abortionBritain in Bible prophesy is known as Ephraim (the US is known as Manasseh). Let's look at some startling prophecies that just may be coming true in Britain right this very moment. Britain lost its way, when it first legalized abortion in 1967. In the 40 years since abortion has been legal in Britain, the number of babies murdered via abortion has steadily increased each year, from 22,000 in 1967 to over 200,000 a year there now. Since 1967 over 6.7 million babies have been murdered in Britain. Britain has become a mecca for women from all over Europe who are seeking to murder their children. This was prophesied by the Eternal God over 2700 years ago Hosea 9: 11 and 13 11 As for Ephraim, their glory shall fly away like a bird, from the birth, and from the womb, and from the conception. 13 Ephraim, as I saw Tyrus, is planted in a pleasant place: but Ephraim shall bring forth his children to the murderer. In addition to killing off so many of their own children, before they are even born the Lord warned that the British would become infertile. The Telegraph reported, One in 64 babies is born after IVF (in vitro fertilization), figures released today show, as more British couples seek fertility treatment... More than 32,000 women had IVF treatment in 2005 in Britain, up 6 percent from the previous year. In total there were only 722,500 babies born in Britain in 2005. 11,262 of which were a result of IVF. The fact is that for most of these lives born as a result of IVF, at least one partner in the relationship would probably be infertile. This evidence of growing infertility in Britain makes one take a questioning look at what else God said about Britain through the prophet Hosea: Hosea 9:16 16 Ephraim is smitten, their root is dried up, they shall bear no fruit: yea, though they bring forth, yet will I slay even the beloved fruit of their womb. "Slay even the beloved fruit of their womb"? In this regard it is worthy to note here. Only a few countries in Europe have more stillbirths than women in Britain do. In 2007, almost 4000 stillbirth baby deaths occurred in Britain. That's 10 a day in both England and Wales. This rate has stayed steady for over a decade. Why Britain you may ask? There's a moral sickness in Britain, much the same as America is inflicted with. This moral sickness has caused the loss of Britain's glory. So, the same will happen to America because both keep murdering their babies. Article above --figures and outline taken from an article (The Sick Man of Europe?) in the March 2008 issue of The Philadelphia Trumpet. |
Who is Responsible for these Millions of Murdered Babies? | |||
Democrats, Feminists and You...
| |||
This article below is a really good read about the feminist movement and it's hypocritical viewpoints. It is a bit long, but very much worth the time! 7. Commentary by by Don Feder, Posted Mar 07, 2006: http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=13017 Back in the 1980s, when conservative social critics suggested it was better for the mothers of young children to stay home (instead of consigning them to day-care gulags), feminists were furious. "How dare you tell women what to do!" they screeched. "The nerve trying to tell us how to live our lives!" So, guess who's now telling women how to live, and excoriating them for thinking independently? Feminists. Under a veneer of empowerment, the movement has always been fascistic. It's instructive to now see the sisters goose-stepping out of the totalitarian closet, truncheons raised to smash errant skulls. Leading the charge is Linda Hirshman, lawyer, professor and scourge of stay-at-home moms. Recently, ABC's Good Morning America (which my friends at the Media Research Center call "Good Morning Morons") showcased Hirshman's rant on two consecutive shows, in segments titled Mommy Wars: To Work or Stay at Home? and How to Raise Kids: Stay Home or Go to Work? Typical of what passes for balance on the networks, Good Morning America afforded roughly 80% of each segment to Hirshman's views. Dissenters got nodding notice to maintain the pretence of fairness. Hirshman has attained celebrity status by alerting us to the under-reported crisis of our time -- despite decades of feminist indoctrination (delivered from the classroom to entertainment television --where what used to be called housewives are practically nonexistent) -- women are actually choosing to stay at home and nurture their children. Global terrorism, global warming - kids' stuff, by comparison. ABC cited census data showing 54% of mothers with a graduate or professional degree no longer work full- time. This is bolstered by Hirshman's own study of 30 women whose wedding announcements appeared in the New York Times in 2003 and 2004. Only five are now working full-time outside the home. Ten work part time. The rest lead lives unsatisfactory to Hirshman and her allies. Feminists are threatened by this phenomenon. It's ideology -- and not the interests of women, individually or collectively -- that drives them. Hirshman's position: Stay-at-home moms are leading impoverished lives, wasting their educations, short-changing their children (who miss the joys of being raised by total strangers who are paid to care about them) and doing incalculable damage to the cause of women's rights. "I think it's a terrible mistake for these highly educated and capable women to make that choice (choosing children and home over career), Hirshman declares. "I am saying an educated, competent adult'' place is in the office." Yes, I think we got that. The Ms. Magazine Poster Person isn't buying the argument that raising the next generation is in any way, shape or form fulfilling. "I would like to see a description of their daily lives that substantiates that," Hirshman harrumphs. "Their description of their lives does not sound particularly interesting or fulfilling for a complicated person, for a complicated, educated person," she adds. What Hirshman means is: "I don't find their lives particularly interesting or fulfilling -- and my judgment is the measure of all things." And to think, feminists have been accused of elitism. Hirshman belittles those women who believe there's no substitute for mom. She pushes a proposition absurd on its face -- that there is no difference in the "happiness levels" of children consigned to the Joyful Tots Detention Center, versus those raised at home. In the first place, only someone with a PhD. (a complicated, educated idiot) thinks happiness levels can be measured. And what about the disease and abuse (physical and sexual) rampant in day care? How about the fact that children in day care tend to be more aggressive and less socialized that their raised-at-home peers? Have you ever witnessed the heart-rending spectacle of a three-year-old crying and pushing its mother away -- screaming that it wants to be taken to day care? Nor will you. As a counterpoint to Hirshman, Good Morning America presented Debbie Klett, a mother who left a job in ad sales and founded a magazine called Total 180, to spend more time with her kids. Klett: "For me, I feel it is vital to be there for my children every day, to consistently tend to their needs, to grow their self-esteem, and to praise them when they're right, guide them when they're not, and to be a loving, caring mom every minute of the day." Why, the anti-social wretch! To clinch her argument, Hirshman notes the divorce rate is over 40%. These ninnies, says she, they devote themselves to hubby and kinder, then they're cast aside in a divorce and see their standard of living take a nose dive. But it was feminists in the '70s who pushed no-fault divorce, which -- they maintained -- would liberate women from stultifying marriages. Now they're using the divorce rate to scare women into the workforce. Talk about chutzpah. Hirshman has a prescription for the ticking of biological clocks: "Have a baby. (If you must.) Just don't have two," which makes work outside the home difficult. Also, Hirshman advises, find Mr. Mom -- a guy who's into diapers and dirty dishes. "You can either find a spouse with less social power (read: money) than you or find one with an ideological commitment to gender equality (read: gender sameness)." I can just picture the personal ad: "Feminist seeks socially inferior, self-neutered male who believes that men and women are emotionally androgynous. Objective: A matrimonial merger and the production of one child, who will be raised by the proverbial village on The Feminist Mystique and Our Bodies, Our Selves (between viewings of Thelma and Louise and G.I. Jane)." In the '80s, young women had a word for such fine specimens -- "wimp." Linda Hirshman is doing a great service to humanity. She is glaringly obnoxious proof of what conservatives have been saying for decades --feminists hate the family. (Hirshman: "The family -- with its repetitious, socially invisible, physical tasks -- is a necessary part of life, but allows fewer opportunities for full human flourishing than public spheres like the market or government.") In other words, the female insurance executive or the female junior college instructor (lecturing a roomful of bored freshmen in a 101 course) is engaged in stimulating, fulfilling, socially useful activity, while the mother who sees a human being developing on a daily basis, and shapes that life more than anyone else, is a brain-dead drudge and a dupe. Here's the ultimate irony: Feminists are anti-feminine. They reject hearth and home, procreation and childrearing (unless it's done by "professionals"). They deny the maternal instinct. They condemn the feminine urge to nurture and to create a safe haven from the perils of modern life. (They also deny the male imperative to serve and protect.) Everything that's distinctive about their sex, they abhor. Because they hate their nature, they are self- loathing. Most are miserable -- and deservedly so. For almost 20 years, I worked in a newsroom with these resentful, envious, humorless harpies. An uglier lot you will never find -- this side of Alien vs. Predator. Most were deeply unhappy with their lives, always ready to take offense at imaginary slights, convinced that any lack of advancement was due to a chauvinist conspiracy and angry at those who challenged feminist dogma. They were about as much fun as Hillary on a bad hair day (speaking of resentful, envious, humorless harpies). Who in their right mind would take life advice from such spiritually misshapen creatures? ABC News, of course. This article was originally posted at GrasstopsUSA.com. Mr. Feder is a former syndicated columnist for the Boston Herald and author of Who's Afraid of the Religious Right? (Regnery) and A Jewish Conservative Looks at Pagan America. He works as a freelance writer and media consultant and serves as the president of Jews Against Anti-Christian Defamation. | |||
| Catholic visitors may want to visit Father Frank Pavone's site, "Priests for Life" here | |||
A powerful and critically acclaimed new video documentary on Darwinism – which proves the evolutionary theory's founder should share with Adolph Hitler the blame for the Holocaust, as well as for the more than 52 million American lives lost to abortion
| |||
See this DVD documentary: here | |||
The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has spent tens of millions of U.S. tax dollars to promote so-called "reproductive rights" programs in Third World countries.
In 2006 USAID spent $371,249,000.00 - all of it tax dollars - for "reproductive health" programs. That's code for abortion, sterilization, contraception and other population control programs.
Making this situation even more desperate, USAID has joined forces with the world's foremost proponent of abortion, the International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF).
And Planned Parenthood's own "research" organization, the Guttmacher Institute, confirms the fact that it is your tax dollars that are funding the world's "population control" movement:
"The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has been and remains the single largest contributor of funds for family planning and reproductive health services worldwide. In addition, it is the single largest donor of contraceptives globally."
Agencies at the United Nations - funded in part by your tax dollars - are also active promoters of abortion. They "bribe" poor nations. They withhold funds for food, clean water, roads, health care and other vital needs, until developing nations implement UN programs which promote abortion and forced sterilization.
On top of this, billionaires like Bill Gates, Warren Buffet and Ted Turner help finance this deadly agenda. Turner gave over $1 million to fund UN "population control" programs. The Bill and Linda Gates Foundation has given IPPF over $20 BILLION!
| |||
The Vatican described abortion as "murder"
The Vatican has urged all Catholics to stop donating money to Amnesty International, accusing the human rights group of promoting abortion. The Vatican also said it was suspending all financial aid to Amnesty over what it said was the group's recent change of policy on the issue. Amnesty said it was not promoting abortion as a universal right. But the group said that women had a right to choose, particularly in cases of rape or incest. "No more financing of Amnesty International after the organization's pro-abortion about-turn," said a statement from the Roman Catholic Church's Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace. 'Misrepresented account' The council's president, Cardinal Renato Martino, described abortion as "murder". "And to justify it selectively, in the event of rape, that is to define an innocent child in the belly of its mother as an enemy, as 'something one can destroy'," the cardinal said. Amnesty says it does not take any position on whether abortion is right or wrong. But it defended its new position in support of abortion for women when their health is in danger or human rights are violated, especially in cases of rape or incest. "We are saying broadly that to criminalise women's management of their sexual reproductive right is the wrong answer," Amnesty's deputy Secretary General Kate Gilmore told Reuters news agency. "The Catholic Church, through a misrepresented account of our position on selective aspects of abortion, is placing in peril work on human rights," Ms Gilmore said. Some 45 million unintended pregnancies are terminated around the world every year, the World Health Organization says. Nearly 70,000 women die annually from unsafe abortions, it says. |
Giuliani (the Terrible)
| ||||||
| ||||||
| ||||||
Did my Son's message not tug at your heart?
Did you ever wonder?
He came down from Heaven and took your sins on Himself!
He came down from Heaven and took your sins on Himself!
Don't kill His Children!
|
Other Great Links at Bible Probe
Figure the Odds
Over 300 Prophecies Jesus Fulfilled
Real Angel Visit to a Muslim in Iran
The Exodus Happened
See Chariot Wheels found in the Red Sea |
Murdering tools preferred by abortionists
 |  |
Syringe with Spinal Needle to poison
|
Forceps
|
 |  |
Curette
|
Cannula
|
WHERE PLANNED PARENTHOOD "HOLOCAUST" CLINICS ARE LOCATED: click HERE
No comments:
Post a Comment