Monday, 29 August 2016

Alex Jones Warns America: We Must Stop Crooked Hillary!


Published on Aug 28, 2016
The speech in Reno was billed as Hillary’s moment to demonize Trump by equating him with racist, white supremacist conspiracy theorists, but she ended up weaving a giant fairytale of her own, reinvoking the vast “right wing conspiracy” that she has been ridiculed for hammering on in the past.

Except this time it’s former KGB agent and Russian President Vladimir Putin who is somehow the evil genius secretly controlling Infowars, Breitbart, Nigel Farage and the entire Alt-Right. Hillary said Putin is, “The godfather of this global brand of extreme nationalism.”

But Trump is the conspiracy theorist.

Yeah, OK Hillary. http://www.infowars.com/paranoid-hill...
http://www.infowars.com/top-gop-congr...
http://www.infowars.com/report-google...
Help us spread the word about the liberty movement, we're reaching millions help us reach millions more. Share the free live video feed link with your friends & family: http://www.infowars.com/show

LEAKED VIDEO: MUSLIM TEACHER TELLS KIDS TO KILL GAYS

Video secretly recorded inside a Muslim school in the UK
Leaked Video: Muslim Teacher Tells Kids to Kill Gays
A shocking video shows a female Islamic scholar teaching young British children how to kill gays and non-Muslims who reject Islam. 
A video that was secretly recorded inside a Muslim school in the UK has gained recent attention on Twitter despite being on YouTube for months.
The radical Islamic woman first illustrates what happens when a person decides to leave Islam.“What are we going to do?” asks the woman in broken English. “We kill him. Kill.”
“The ones who reject Islam?” a British student asks.
“Yeah,” the teacher says. “Kill him. You have to kill him. Do you understand? We’re talking about Islam.”
The video jumps to the woman outlining the punishment for adultery.
“The judgment for adultery,” she asks. “What is the law?”
“Stone him,” a student replies.
“Until he dies,” the woman elaborates. “And the one who is not married?”
“Lash him, lash him,” says a chorus of students.
“Yes,” the woman says. “With 100 lashes.”
She then describes with disturbing coldness what the intended punishment is for gays.
“Throw them from the highest place,” she says. “We’re not going to live like animals.”
A student replies with a passage from her Islamic textbook. “’The punishment for homosexuals is throw them from the highest point and then stone them. Then you reduced him to the lowest of the low. So if you throw someone off a mountain you are reducing them to the lowest of the low because they are falling off the highest place’.”
The Islamic teacher further explains the nature of Allah to her students.
“It is not enough that you worship Allah,” she says. “We have to also in our heart hate what displeases Allah and love what Allah loves. You have to hate what displeases Allah, especially when living in this country, with that non-Muslim.”
Another British student reads a passage from her textbook:
“’Verily are free from you and whatever you worship beside Allah. We have rejected you and there has appeared between us and you hostility and hatred forever until you believe in Allah alone’.”
“Islam is keeping you away from disbelief and from the disbelievers,” says the teacher. “Any questions?”
A student then asks if being friends with non-believers is allowed.
“No. You understand?” says the teacher. “You don’t have to be friends with them. That is not allowed. Because loyalty is only to the Muslim, not to thekafir.”
The word ‘kafir’ is a derogatory term used in the Muslim world to describe unbelievers.
Rather than condemn this disgusting footage, the shameful liberal media and their ilk are more likely to defend it by decrying the video itself to be an act of “hate speech” toward Muslims. But there are those on Twitter who are calling it out for what it is: insane.
Screen Shot 2016-08-29 at 12.37.00 PM

Sanhedrin Elects Israel's High Priest


in an emergency should be confiscated farms

Stand: 10:12 Reading time: 2 minutes

12:04
12:45
 
AUTOPLAY
Source: The World
Authorities should be able to seize farms and food businesses In the event of a supply crisis.
  • Considering coming war, power failure, pandemic or a terrorist attack involving release of radioactive radiation.
  • Powerful method for screening is the "stockpiling by households".
Why it matters:
Even if such a crisis is unlikely, it can not be completely excluded.
01
D
ie federal government regulates the supply of citizens with food in case of serious crisis again. "A supply crisis is a scenario in which up to 80 million people on the free market do not have access to food more and therefore have to be sovereign supplies", according to a prepared by the Ministry of Agriculture bill, which present the news agency Reuters.

While such a crisis is unlikely, but it could not be completely ruled out: Considering came a warlike conflict, a widespread power outage, a pandemic or a terrorist attack involving large-scale release of radioactive radiation.
Extreme weather conditions, technical faults, natural disasters or the release of hazardous substances should not be a contrast according to the experts supply crisislead. "Such events could since the Federal Republic always be overcome by means of civil protection", puts it in the draft, which is currently in the departmental co-ordination between ministries and should also be approved by the Federal Council.

Specifications of postwar

The draft contains the known authorizations with which the government may adopt rules for the production and allocation of food. New features include powers to allow the authorities in an emergency the seizure of farms and other food establishments.
The government comes with the new regulation demands the Federal Audit Office.Its inspectors had in 2011 alleging that the still originating from the post-war period in its origins guidelines for dealing with a supply crisis contained vulnerabilities.
The Court reminded the audience, among other things the development of current crisis scenarios. In addition, the examiner argued for adopting an integrated approach with uniform regulations for military and civil emergencies. So far, there are two separate laws.

State stockpiling is checked

In addition to checking the state stockpiling of food and rearranged. This was also a requirement of the Federal Court. The Federal Agency for Agriculture and Food has been one part responsible for the so-called Civilian emergency reserve of rice, peas, lentils and condensed milk, which is intended to help in a crisis, especially in metropolitan areas in the care of people with at least one daily meal.
In addition, the Institute administers the Federal Reserve cereal with wheat, rye and oats, which is mounted near mills. So to be maintained in the event of a crisis, the supply of flour and bread.
However, the most powerful method for screening is the "stockpiling by households", says the draft. Recommendations to private stocks are also long been part of the civil defense concept, which recast Federal Interior Minister Thomas de Maizière recently introduced.

Sunday, 28 August 2016

The Real Book Of Giants as in the days of Noah it will be again!!!!


Several reconstructions in full from ancient fragments. 
The Book of the Giants was published in not less than six or seven languages. From the original Syriac the Greek and Middle Persian versions were made. Also known as The Book of Giants or the Book Of Og (Vir-Og-dad) it's about the Giborim, the sons of the Nephilim, the Fallen Angels, it features a full summary of the interesting "Dream Sequences" (parables) of the giants, via the Interpretations of several professional theologians. Reading from The Book of Giants found in the Qumran Caves, the Dead Sea Scrolls and the Ka-Wan of the Manichaeans, we'll reconstruct the full story, and examine several key aspects. GIANTS AT THE NORTH POLE /EDEN? The book of giants, or known as the book of Og (ogres), states that 32 or 36 towns were built for the wicked sons of the giants near Mt Sumeru, at the North Pole. They were taken there to spare them from the war betwen the giants and the angels. Another name for the area is Aryan - Vedan,'Aryan - Weyzan' in Indo-Iranian. According to the ancient texts, these people originated the arts and crafts and built weapons for a war between the giants and the angels. The book of Enoch, and the Apocalypse of Baruch (and many other texts) are considered 'OT Apocrypha', and are kept out of the modern bible. Enoch is part of the original 88 books of the bible.
From Wikipedia: "The Book of Enoch (also 1 Enoch, Ge'ez: መጽሐፈ ሄኖክ mätṣḥäfä henok) is an ancient Jewish religious work, ascribed by tradition to Enoch, the great-grandfather of Noah, although modern scholars estimate the older sections (mainly in the Book of the Watchers) to date from about 300 BC, and the latest part (Book of Parables) probably to the first century BC. It is not part of the biblical canon as used by Jews, apart from Beta Israel. It is regarded as canonical by the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church and Eritrean Orthodox Tewahedo Church, and it is wholly extant in the Ge'ez language, with Aramaic fragments from the Dead Sea Scrolls and a few Greek and Latin fragments. For this and other reasons, the traditional Ethiopian belief is that the original language of the work was Ge'ez. The books author was Enoch himself, before the Biblical Flood. The authors of the New Testament were familiar with the content of the story and influenced by it: a critical part of the bible, a section of 1 Enoch (1 En 1:9 or 1 En 2:1 depending on the translation) is quoted in the New Testament (Epistle of Jude 1:14–15), and is attributed there to "Enoch the Seventh from Adam" (1 En 60:8). The text was also used by the community that originally collected the Dead Scrolls Canonicity and was evidently widely known during the development of the Hebrew Bible Canon. The biblical story revolves completely around the book of giants and the book of Enoch as without these tales it lacks context.




Note the mention of the Kephalia, the montrosity that controls the ebb and flow of tides and weather. This is also in an upcoming piece of mine.

Russian High Command Moves To Bunkers we have maybe Two Weeks Left at Best!!!!


Wednesday, 24 August 2016

Louisiana Floods Show Harm Caused By Climate Change Denial And Neglect Of US Infrastructure

Former Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal once declared that ‘the Obama administration is holding us hostage to their radical ideas’ about climate change, but thousands in the state are suffering from the very real effects of historic flooding caused by climate change.
By  @KitOConnell August 24, 2016

    • Google+
    Danny and Alys Messenger canoe away from their flooded home after reviewing the damage in Prairieville, La., Tuesday, Aug. 16, 2016.
    Danny and Alys Messenger canoe away from their flooded home after reviewing the damage in Prairieville, La., Tuesday, Aug. 16, 2016.
    AUSTIN, Texas — In addition to highlighting the growing impact of climate change on everyday Americans, historic flooding in Louisiana shows the deadly effects of long-term U.S. policies that include climate change denial, support for fossil fuels, and neglect of infrastructure.
    At least eight people died, some 40,000 homes were damaged, and about 30,000 people were evacuated as flood waters rose earlier this month after heavy rains that began on Aug. 11. A dozen parishes in the state are considered federal disaster areas.
    Both the national media and President Barack Obama have been criticized for being slow to respond to the floods. Some have even suggested that the flooding was underestimated because floods, unlike major weather events like hurricanes, aren’t given names.
    “When you have a storm that is unnamed—it wasn’t a hurricane, it wasn’t a tropical event—people underestimate the impact that it would have,” said Louisiana Gov. John Bel Edwards, according to an Aug. 17 report from Slate.
    “But this is historic. It’s unprecedented and we are seeing unprecedented flood levels as the water moves south.”

    A warmer, wetter world

    Climate scientists overwhelmingly agree about the reality of climate change and its increasingly devastating effects. While no event can be definitively linked to climate change, its effects are becoming increasingly obvious as extreme weather, from fires to flooding, becomes more commonplace.
    Observations from NASA satellites show that Arctic sea ice is now declining at a rate of 11.5 percent per decade, relative to the 1979 to 2000 average. Arctic sea ice reaches its minimum extent each September. This time series, based on satellite data, shows the annual Arctic sea ice minimum since 1979. The September 2010 extent was the third lowest in the satellite record.
    Observations from NASA satellites show that Arctic sea ice is now declining at a rate of 11.5 percent per decade, relative to the 1979 to 2000 average. Melting Arctic sea ice due to climate change is contributing to the rapid rise of sea levels, and subsequent flooding.
    Reflecting on the floods on Aug. 15, climate experts Bob Henson and Dr. Jeff Masters, founder of Weather Underground, wrote:
    “Climate change has already been shown to increase the amounts of rain falling in the most intense events across many parts of the world, and extreme rainfall events like this week’s Louisiana storm are expected to grow increasingly common in the coming years.”
    While man-made climate change promotes globally rising temperatures and increasingly frequent droughts, it also contributes to severe storms. The Washington Post’s Philip Bump reported on Friday:
    “A warmer atmosphere can also hold more moisture before it falls. For every 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit the temperature of the atmosphere increases, the moisture-holding capacity of the atmosphere increases 7 percent, according to the Centre for Ecology & Hydrology in the United Kingdom.
    That’s why climate models predict two seemingly contradictory trends: The world will get drier as the number of extreme precipitation events increases.”

    The ‘radical ideas’ holding America hostage

    There’s a long road to recovery ahead for the people of Louisiana, but they may have an advantage going forward: Breaking with many in his party, Gov. Edwards at least acknowledges the impact of climate change and the necessity of protecting state residents from its effects.
    Bobby Jindal, Edwards’ predecessor who governed the state for eight years, sometimes acknowledged the reality of global warming, but overall, he denied prevailing climate change science. Jindal joined a host of Republicans who said he preferred to let “scientists” figure out how to handle climate change, even thoughJindal has a biology degree.
    Then Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal stands with an oiled Brown Pelican on the beach at East Grand Terre Island along the Louisiana coast, June 3, 2010.
    Then Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal stands with an oiled Brown Pelican on the beach at East Grand Terre Island along the Louisiana coast, June 3, 2010.
    In 2014, as he prepared for an unsuccessful run for the GOP nomination for president this year, Jindal told members of the Heritage Foundation, an influential conservative think tank, that climate change is a “simply a trojan horse” to enable increased government regulation of business, according to U.S. News & World Report.
    “It’s an excuse for the government to come in and try to tell us what kind of homes we live in, what kind of cars we drive, what kind of lifestyles we can enjoy,” Jindal said. “It’s an excuse for some who never liked free-market economies, who never liked rapid economic growth.”
    “Emissions regulations and environmental protections introduced by the White House, he concluded, illustrate that ‘the Obama administration is holding our economy hostage to their radical ideas,’” Alan Neuhauser reported.
    Jindal’s attitude is still reflected in today’s Republican Party, despite the shift in attitude among some leaders like Edwards. On Friday, Donald Trump, the GOP’s presidential nominee, made a high-profile tour of the flood zone and promised to support the victims as president, but he also has a history of denying climate change. In 2012, he took to Twitter to claim global warming was a Chinese conspiracy meant to undermine U.S. manufacturing. If elected, Trump has promised to “cancel” the Paris climate agreement.
    The concept of global warming was created by and for the Chinese in order to make U.S. manufacturing non-competitive.

    Pro-fracking, ‘all of the above’ energy policies worsen climate change

    Under the direction of climate change deniers, the GOP has repeatedly acted to block climate change legislation. They’ve even blocked climate action driven by the Pentagon, which is growing increasingly alarmed about the effects of climate change on global peace and stability, even as the U.S. military remains one of the world’s leading polluters.
    And while the U.S. government, especially Congress, is infamously split along partisan lines, the Democrats have also contributed to worsening climate change. During his time in office, Obama has enthusiastically endorsed an “all of the above” energy policy that includes heavy investment in dirty technologies like fracking and natural gas.
    While Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton has promised to scale back fracking and support renewable energy, some observers are not confident in her commitment to these promises, especially after her appointment of Ken Salazar, a pro-fossil fuels, pro-fracking former senator, to lead her White House transition team.
    Former U.S. Interior Department Secretary Ken Salazar gestures while speaking in support of the re-election of now-former U.S. Senator Mark Udall, in Denver.
    Former U.S. Interior Department Secretary Ken Salazar gestures while speaking in support of the re-election of now-former U.S. Senator Mark Udall, in Denver.
    On Aug. 17, David Sirota, senior editor for International Business Times, told Democracy Now! that Salazar is “somebody who is very close to the oil and gas industry, and somebody who has been a big defender of fracking, in the face of evidence that there are reasons to be concerned about the environmental and public health effects of that process.”
    Expressing concerns on the influence Salazar would have on a new Clinton administration, Sirota asked, “What does it mean for the future, when another pipeline proposal, for instance, comes down the pike? We don’t know.”
    And despite years of bipartisan support for fossil fuels, politicians have been unable to agree on financial support for the infrastructure on which American society depends. The American Society of Civil Engineers gives Louisiana a C- on its infrastructure report card, citing the state’s 1,827 structurally deficient bridges, 45 dams at high risk of failure, and a system of poorly maintained levees that Louisiana depends on to hold back flood waters.
    Ironically, that puts the fossil fuel industry itself at risk in extreme weather. According to an Aug. 17 report from Bloomberg, rising sea levels, along with catastrophic flooding, threaten $100 billion in energy infrastructure in the state of Louisiana.
    “Louisiana has an ambitious — and expensive — plan to protect both its backbone industry and its citizens from this threat but, with a $2 billion deficit looming next year, the cash-poor state can only do so much to shore up its sinking coasts,” wrote Bloomberg’s Catherine Traywick.  “That means the oil and gas industry is facing new pressures to bankroll critical environmental projects — whether by choice or by force.”
    Writing on Friday for The Guardian, Raul Grijalva, a Democratic representative from Arizona’s 3rd District, wrote that “Republican leaders have made compromise on climate issues impossible.”
    As global warming worsens, Grijalva suggested that political action on climate change will become inevitable if the species hopes to survive. He continued:
    “In throwing away a once proud environmental legacy, the party of Donald Trump – the party that makes oil drilling the centerpiece of its environmental agenda and insists that climate scientists are just ganging up on Exxon to enrich themselves – is forfeiting its seat at the table when climate policy is inevitably made down the line.”
    Grijalva added that climate denial is both dangerous to the U.S. and harmful to the GOP’s continued relevancy, noting that:
    “Pretending that climate change isn’t real was politically expedient in the past. Today it’s dangerous for millions of Americans, and it dooms the Republican Party to irrelevance in climate discussions.”
    Be Sociable, Share!